Yesterday I went to a talk by Jim Kaufman from Cambridge which I found very informative. Textbooks on immunology usually concentrate largely on the human immune system and the immune system of the mouse, as the main experimental animal. For a long time it was believed that adaptive immunity was confined to vertebrates (with a few exceptions like lampreys which appeared to lack it). Those animals which have adaptive immunity seem to have the whole package, in the sense that they have antibodies, T cells and MHC molecules. So it looks like that from an evolutionary point of view all these things arose about the same time (on the time scales typical for evolution). In this talk I discovered that very many invertebrates have adaptive immunity. They use different systems from that familiar from vertebrates and often different systems from each other. Insects are included. Drosophila, for instance, has an adaptive immune system based on a single gene which can be spliced in a huge number of different ways. From the references given in the talk it looked to me as if these facts about invertebrates came out in about the last five years.
One of the main themes of the talk was that there is a big divide in adaptive immunity between mammals and other vertebrates. (There is a marsupial which is an exception.) The difference concerns the major histocompatibility complex. The MHC molecules in chickens (to take the principal example discussed in the talk) are more adapted to specific pathogens than is the case in mammals. This might also mean that mammals are particularly susceptible to autoimmune diseases. Apparently not so much is known about autoimmune dieases in non-human mammals or non-mammalian vertebrates. This is understandible from the point of view of the motivation of human beings. Kaufman also pointed out that not very much is known about the frequency of autoimmune diseases in poorer countries.
Another theme of the talk was the evolution of adaptive immunity. I was not able to follow the details very closely. One idea was that T cells appeared relatively early and may have recognized targets directly before there were cells to present them with antigens. Another was that natural killer cells were one of the earliest elements which led to adaptive immunity. In any case I enjoyed the opportunity to obtain an unusually broad view of immunity.
May 21, 2010 at 7:26 pm |
[…] Adaptive immunity across the animal kingdom « Hydrobates […]
August 18, 2012 at 10:56 am |
Here is an update on lampreys (and hagfish). On the blog of the LymDEV workshop which is taking place in Dresden at the moment (http://lymdev12.eu/) there is a link to a video of a talk of Max Cooper on the evolution of adaptive immunity. When I tried to connect to it I came onto a page which asked me for a password and so I was blocked. I did however manage to find a video of a talk on the same subject by the same speaker on another occasion which is available via vimeo. There he explains his discovery that lampreys do have an adaptive immune system with analogues of B cells and T cells. At the same time the molecular systems are very different from those of other vertebrates and there is no antigen presentation involved. At this point I feel the desire to mention that I once ate lamprey during a visit to Bordeaux, where it is a speciality. It tasted good but I felt sick afterwards. I do not blame the lamprey and I would try it again. I think that the cause of my discomfort was something else, perhaps the motion of the TGV on the way back to Paris.
September 29, 2016 at 9:02 am |
[…] exists in vertebrates and hence, in particular, not in the worm. Some related comments can be found here. It seems that C. elegans has no adaptive immune system at all but it does have innate immunity. It […]
December 3, 2018 at 7:42 am |
We like your web site, it has good information, Thanks!