<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lyapunov-Schmidt reduction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alanrendall.wordpress.com/2008/12/07/lyapunov-schmidt-reduction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alanrendall.wordpress.com/2008/12/07/lyapunov-schmidt-reduction/</link>
	<description>A mathematician thinks aloud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 07:10:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hydrobates</title>
		<link>http://alanrendall.wordpress.com/2008/12/07/lyapunov-schmidt-reduction/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hydrobates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alanrendall.wordpress.com/?p=196#comment-524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,

What I wrote is not wrong but I have been a little sloppy with the notation. I said &#039;do linear transformations independently in the domain and range&#039; which implies that I am using two different bases. However I did not choose different notations for them. It would have been more precise (and less confusing?) if I had put primes on the basis vectors with indices 2 to n.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>What I wrote is not wrong but I have been a little sloppy with the notation. I said &#8216;do linear transformations independently in the domain and range&#8217; which implies that I am using two different bases. However I did not choose different notations for them. It would have been more precise (and less confusing?) if I had put primes on the basis vectors with indices 2 to n.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grigory Bordyugov</title>
		<link>http://alanrendall.wordpress.com/2008/12/07/lyapunov-schmidt-reduction/#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grigory Bordyugov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alanrendall.wordpress.com/?p=196#comment-523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A terrific read, thanks! I was trying to understand the LS reduction and found your explanation excellent.

Just one more technical remark: in general, I guess, the range and the nullspace of N are not complimentary (this is true however if N^2 = N, i.e. N is a kind of projections). That would mean that if e_1 spans the nullspace, that wouldn&#039;t automatically imply that e_2, ..., e_n span the whole range. But I guess you&#039;re interested just in e_1 anyway. Please correct me if I&#039;m wrong.

Yours.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A terrific read, thanks! I was trying to understand the LS reduction and found your explanation excellent.</p>
<p>Just one more technical remark: in general, I guess, the range and the nullspace of N are not complimentary (this is true however if N^2 = N, i.e. N is a kind of projections). That would mean that if e_1 spans the nullspace, that wouldn&#8217;t automatically imply that e_2, &#8230;, e_n span the whole range. But I guess you&#8217;re interested just in e_1 anyway. Please correct me if I&#8217;m wrong.</p>
<p>Yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hydrobates</title>
		<link>http://alanrendall.wordpress.com/2008/12/07/lyapunov-schmidt-reduction/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hydrobates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alanrendall.wordpress.com/?p=196#comment-121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have corrected some typos in the original post. I thank Roger Bieli for pointing them out to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have corrected some typos in the original post. I thank Roger Bieli for pointing them out to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shilnikov&#8217;s theorems on bifurcation from a homoclinic orbit &#171; Hydrobates</title>
		<link>http://alanrendall.wordpress.com/2008/12/07/lyapunov-schmidt-reduction/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shilnikov&#8217;s theorems on bifurcation from a homoclinic orbit &#171; Hydrobates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alanrendall.wordpress.com/?p=196#comment-120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is it must be infinite-dimensional. In the most optimistic case some kind of centre manifold or Lyapunov-Schmidt reduction might be used to get back to a finite-dimensional (even low-dimensional) system. Another problem, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is it must be infinite-dimensional. In the most optimistic case some kind of centre manifold or Lyapunov-Schmidt reduction might be used to get back to a finite-dimensional (even low-dimensional) system. Another problem, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
